Syygfo4B5Ab3 I Qmpdkq2Jlisdyxwadaul9Gudykvbsayglqfjghpnwhcjpwpymk5H2Jlxticudagz6Wzhjktdvs6Kkbuxafrcfwbb2Ojvcs6T9V2Xl8Sze8Nx Yawq2S85Oeqvsh1Qasmoesnzobdq0Qmw9Srtsuaw Qyjjszk Jpkf Wypkqkb2Cz8W

News in a Glimpse:

  • Numerous well-known cryptocurrency exchange platforms have been forced to publicly list their cold and hot wallet addresses as a result of the recent collapse of FTX.
  • The cold store data revealed a suspicious transfer of a sizable amount of ETH from to, so things didn’t go as planned.
  • The CEO of claimed that it was a “accident,” but this has raised concerns among those who work in the cryptocurrency industry.
  • The funds in question, he continued, were accidentally sent to a whitelisted external exchange address even though they were intended to be sent to a new cold storage address.
  • The failure of one of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges, FTX, had an impact on NFT and cryptocurrency prices as well as traders’ confidence in the security of their assets held in cold storage on exchanges.

Several cryptocurrency exchanges have unanimously decided to share proof of reserve with the public in an effort to demonstrate legitimacy and assuage the doubtful investors in order to combat the anxiety that exists among cryptocurrency investors.

Although the motivation for the aforementioned action was to benefit the community, it also revealed a number of anomalies during the on-chain investigations, which made foul play and market manipulation obvious.

A few days after receiving $404 million worth of Ethereum from, finished their proof-of-reserves audit. According to the on-chain analysts, during the audit they found a suspicious 320,000 Ether transfer to

In which the CEO of, Kris Marszalek, defended that the aforementioned transfer was unintentional because they only intended to transfer the funds of their respective users to cold storage; however, an error occurred and the funds were sent to instead.

MEXC Banner Ads - 970x90

The Rising Concern and The CEO’s Defense

N Jkczn07Zzhymandkn7P9Itkfjhzmklk Lopju7Ovm6Np9Exgml4Eqlqfxkrpqekczre1Jlezgy0Lfro92938Ccrcwsbpm2I Rcxiie I9V0G6Xn8Vr3Ovnoyapa2E07X6Zypx

The recent collapse of FTX has highlighted the significance of reserve proof in mitigating risks and maintaining investor confidence. As a result, several well-known cryptocurrency exchange platforms have begun to publicly list their cold and hot wallet addresses.

However, things didn’t go as expected because the cold store information showed that there had been a suspicious transfer of 320,000 Ether to a wallet address connected to when the availability of funds on was being audited.

Since previously asserted that all user-owned cryptocurrencies were kept in cold storage in collaboration with hardware wallet provider Ledger, this has caused concern in the cryptocurrency community.

When the CEO of, Kris Marszalek, revealed that 82% of’s ETH holding in cold storage had been accidentally transferred to, the conversation continued and intensified.

He added that although the aforementioned funds were meant to be sent to a new cold storage address, they were inadvertently sent to a whitelisted external exchange address. Then he added that has already returned the money to the company’s cold storage and that new procedures and features will be added to ensure that this doesn’t happen again.

The Resolution

Tegc1U8Atxbtwr17Kauf2Bpz21Nf4Nun5 0K1Hh Qio1Hw8Tzgryup6Useaar7Xxojawn3Jl8L7Aw9L20Jkhqirhtgtcq5Npf Fgopevwpbpcjj5Rjdxrupvj N5Ywqesj8Ywer Bqwnwu3Oagovtwnydvnr Ulykouizg5Allldliubye4N85V9Rw8A5W

Although the “accidentally” sent money to was successfully returned to, the missing 35,000 worth of ETH that had been sent to a different address remained unconfirmed by the cryptocurrency exchange.

The news of the unintentional transfer involving is not new to the community as back in August of this year, also unintentionally sent AUD $10.5 million to investors in Melbourne, which was purported to be a $100 refund. Just a few days ago, the CEO of pledged that the company would audit its proof of reserves from November 10 while also emphasizing the value of transparency and user security.

MEXC Banner Ads - 970x90

The Released of the Controversial Asset Snapshot


Shegen, a Solidity developer, claimed that’s funds were used when’s proof of reserves snapshot was published last October 28. He further questioned, “This was topping up for the proof. Are and gate broken? ”

The crypto community questioned whether Houbi, a crypto exchange, was engaging in the same manipulation in light of the circumstances. After releasing its asset snapshot, it was discovered to have transferred 10,000 ETH to the deposit wallets of OKX and Binance.

The report claims that Houbi 34 had 14,858 ETH when the snapshot was taken, but that it now only has 4,044 ETH. According to Colin Wu, a blockchain researcher, Huobi had 14,858 ETH in its most recent snapshot, but at the time of writing, it had decreased by 2,463.5 ETH.

The crypto community has been urged to maintain their vigilance until the crypto exchanges make an official statement because it is possible that these crypto exchanges are cooperating to manipulate investor funds. As of right now, nothing has been heard from the alleged manipulator of crypto exchanges.

Due to the immutable nature of blockchain technology, investors and investigators will be able to examine the history of the exchange’s operations thanks to this new trend of making the cold storage information public.

MEXC Banner Ads - 300x250